Comments on: The future of programming languages http://blog.jaoo.dk/2008/10/07/the-future-of-programming-languages/ For developers - by developers Sun, 24 Apr 2011 11:26:05 +0200 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: robert http://blog.jaoo.dk/2008/10/07/the-future-of-programming-languages/comment-page-1/#comment-11108 robert Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:07:35 +0000 http://blog.jaoo.dk/?p=189#comment-11108 Awsome talks. Anders, thats a terrible shirt. Awsome talks.

Anders, thats a terrible shirt.

]]> By: BellaKitty http://blog.jaoo.dk/2008/10/07/the-future-of-programming-languages/comment-page-1/#comment-9001 BellaKitty Tue, 14 Jul 2009 04:39:17 +0000 http://blog.jaoo.dk/?p=189#comment-9001 Great post. This is why MS will never die. Sadly for linux heads like me lol. Nah I use windows daily. Just kidding. Great post. This is why MS will never die. Sadly for linux heads like me lol. Nah I use windows daily. Just kidding.

]]> By: Martin Prange http://blog.jaoo.dk/2008/10/07/the-future-of-programming-languages/comment-page-1/#comment-4386 Martin Prange Sat, 14 Mar 2009 02:03:34 +0000 http://blog.jaoo.dk/?p=189#comment-4386 Don't worry: For security level 2-4, there is no dynamic language allowed( and for level 1 it is discouraged.) (For details, just refer to the appropriate standard, in europe it is I think EN23825.en it comes to sec level 3 or 4) So, your buddy's reprogramming the companies lift in dynamic-XYZ, that'll left for your own pleasure(gee....no risk, no fun) Airplanes, nuklear powerplants, secure parts of the train management software will remain domains of "static" languages ( with their dynamic parts strictly reduced, i.e. no pointer arithmetics and no pointers at all in c++ at level 4) Why lisp and its ilk was not mentioned despite the fact that is was used with success in hightech industries and extraterrestric space missions, I am unsure. Since I havn't had a beer with him I cannot claim he doesnt know about it, it's as simple as that. Don’t worry: For security level 2-4, there is no dynamic language allowed( and for level 1 it is discouraged.)
(For details, just refer to the appropriate standard, in europe it is I think EN23825.en it comes to sec level 3 or 4)
So, your buddy’s reprogramming the companies lift in dynamic-XYZ, that’ll left for your own pleasure(gee….no risk, no fun)
Airplanes, nuklear powerplants, secure parts of the train management software will remain domains of “static” languages ( with their dynamic parts strictly reduced, i.e.
no pointer arithmetics and no pointers at all in c++ at level 4)

Why lisp and its ilk was not mentioned despite the fact that is was used with success in hightech industries and extraterrestric space missions, I am unsure.

Since I havn’t had a beer with him I cannot claim he doesnt know about it, it’s as simple as that.

]]> By: An introduction to the Scala programming language by Bill Venners | JAOO Community Blog http://blog.jaoo.dk/2008/10/07/the-future-of-programming-languages/comment-page-1/#comment-4304 An introduction to the Scala programming language by Bill Venners | JAOO Community Blog Mon, 09 Mar 2009 10:27:23 +0000 http://blog.jaoo.dk/?p=189#comment-4304 [...] Bill Venners, co-author of the Scala book, gave a nice introduction to the Scala programming Language at JAOO last year. Scala is part of the growing trend of multi-paradigm programming languages (designed to integrate features of object-oriented programming and functional programming), and as such fits very well with what Anders Hejlsberg talked about in his keynote presentation “Where Are Programming Languages Going?”. [...] [...] Bill Venners, co-author of the Scala book, gave a nice introduction to the Scala programming Language at JAOO last year. Scala is part of the growing trend of multi-paradigm programming languages (designed to integrate features of object-oriented programming and functional programming), and as such fits very well with what Anders Hejlsberg talked about in his keynote presentation “Where Are Programming Languages Going?”. [...]

]]> By: Diana http://blog.jaoo.dk/2008/10/07/the-future-of-programming-languages/comment-page-1/#comment-3822 Diana Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:05:43 +0000 http://blog.jaoo.dk/?p=189#comment-3822 Thanks for making this available! Thanks for making this available!

]]> By: C# 4.0: Thinking about Software Evolution based on Migration as a Service - Carlos Loría-Sáenz Blog http://blog.jaoo.dk/2008/10/07/the-future-of-programming-languages/comment-page-1/#comment-3514 C# 4.0: Thinking about Software Evolution based on Migration as a Service - Carlos Loría-Sáenz Blog Fri, 16 Jan 2009 01:57:52 +0000 http://blog.jaoo.dk/?p=189#comment-3514 [...] at PDC2008, regarding programming languages and particularly covering the future of C# 4.0; (JAOO).  Both talks offer really interesting perspectives that can be useful when thinking ahead [...] [...] at PDC2008, regarding programming languages and particularly covering the future of C# 4.0; (JAOO).  Both talks offer really interesting perspectives that can be useful when thinking ahead [...]

]]> By: upcoming http://blog.jaoo.dk/2008/10/07/the-future-of-programming-languages/comment-page-1/#comment-3507 upcoming Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:00:23 +0000 http://blog.jaoo.dk/?p=189#comment-3507 I think that the future are small web based engines based mostly on database. Everything will go online and work server side. I think that the future are small web based engines based mostly on database. Everything will go online and work server side.

]]> By: The Future of Programming Languages http://blog.jaoo.dk/2008/10/07/the-future-of-programming-languages/comment-page-1/#comment-3495 The Future of Programming Languages Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:08:27 +0000 http://blog.jaoo.dk/?p=189#comment-3495 [...] my coworker Lou Franco pointed me to a fantastic talk by Anders Hejlsberg on the future of programming languages.  In this talk Anders argues that the future of programming language development will be [...] [...] my coworker Lou Franco pointed me to a fantastic talk by Anders Hejlsberg on the future of programming languages.  In this talk Anders argues that the future of programming language development will be [...]

]]> By: bcooley http://blog.jaoo.dk/2008/10/07/the-future-of-programming-languages/comment-page-1/#comment-1643 bcooley Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:04:25 +0000 http://blog.jaoo.dk/?p=189#comment-1643 I guess in C# 4.0 we'll see: 1. Dynamic typing and dynamic dispatch to interface with dynamic types provided by standard dynamic languages (python ruby). 2. Support for meta-programming and internal domain specific languages. 3. Additional functional constructs (possibly lazy evaluated lambdas, pattern matching). 4. Support for concurrent programming including immutable objects, purity enforcement, and mutable partitions. I guess in C# 4.0 we’ll see:

1. Dynamic typing and dynamic dispatch to interface with dynamic types provided by standard dynamic languages (python ruby).
2. Support for meta-programming and internal domain specific languages.
3. Additional functional constructs (possibly lazy evaluated lambdas, pattern matching).
4. Support for concurrent programming including immutable objects, purity enforcement, and mutable partitions.

]]> By: julian http://blog.jaoo.dk/2008/10/07/the-future-of-programming-languages/comment-page-1/#comment-1636 julian Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:52:13 +0000 http://blog.jaoo.dk/?p=189#comment-1636 Lol @ some people here. That guy has more knowledge of programming languages & tools in his pinky finger than all of us will get in our entire lifetime. He's doing very good things at microsoft. The same as at Borland. Lol @ some people here.

That guy has more knowledge of programming languages & tools in his pinky finger than all of us will get in our entire lifetime.

He’s doing very good things at microsoft. The same as at Borland.

]]> By: “The C# Programming Language Third Edition” and thoughts on language evolution - B# .NET Blog http://blog.jaoo.dk/2008/10/07/the-future-of-programming-languages/comment-page-1/#comment-1628 “The C# Programming Language Third Edition” and thoughts on language evolution - B# .NET Blog Mon, 20 Oct 2008 02:23:23 +0000 http://blog.jaoo.dk/?p=189#comment-1628 [...] is huge; Anders called it the elephant in the room in his JAOO talk (actually our hypothetical new version got a name in an interview with Anders on JAOO, I promise [...] [...] is huge; Anders called it the elephant in the room in his JAOO talk (actually our hypothetical new version got a name in an interview with Anders on JAOO, I promise [...]

]]> By: FlyingAvatar http://blog.jaoo.dk/2008/10/07/the-future-of-programming-languages/comment-page-1/#comment-1533 FlyingAvatar Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:06:23 +0000 http://blog.jaoo.dk/?p=189#comment-1533 Why should he mention Lisp? A language that has failed to achieve any real significant mainstream use despite being around for about 20 years longer than C++ is hardly a language of the future. Why should he mention Lisp? A language that has failed to achieve any real significant mainstream use despite being around for about 20 years longer than C++ is hardly a language of the future.

]]> By: Rick Minerich's Development Wonderland : The Future of Programming Languages http://blog.jaoo.dk/2008/10/07/the-future-of-programming-languages/comment-page-1/#comment-1514 Rick Minerich's Development Wonderland : The Future of Programming Languages Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:10:55 +0000 http://blog.jaoo.dk/?p=189#comment-1514 [...] my coworker Lou Franco pointed me to a fantastic talk by Anders Hejlsberg on the future of programming languages.  In this talk Anders argues that the future of programming language development will be [...] [...] my coworker Lou Franco pointed me to a fantastic talk by Anders Hejlsberg on the future of programming languages.  In this talk Anders argues that the future of programming language development will be [...]

]]> By: Pat http://blog.jaoo.dk/2008/10/07/the-future-of-programming-languages/comment-page-1/#comment-1513 Pat Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:03:45 +0000 http://blog.jaoo.dk/?p=189#comment-1513 Why is it so hard for some people to believe that there are intelligent people who have used Lisp, understood it, and not found it to be compelling or relevant in every future discussion of languages? Why is it so hard for some people to believe that there are intelligent people who have used Lisp, understood it, and not found it to be compelling or relevant in every future discussion of languages?

]]> By: Rick http://blog.jaoo.dk/2008/10/07/the-future-of-programming-languages/comment-page-1/#comment-1508 Rick Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:50:02 +0000 http://blog.jaoo.dk/?p=189#comment-1508 Actually, you NEED a static language so that you can safely construct large programs without worrying about run time bugs from small typos. Actually, you NEED a static language so that you can safely construct large programs without worrying about run time bugs from small typos.

]]>