<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Railing sketches &#8211; metaprogramming Ruby for fun and profit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jaoo.dk/2008/09/30/railing-sketches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jaoo.dk/2008/09/30/railing-sketches/</link>
	<description>For developers - by developers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:58:52 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jgwong</title>
		<link>http://blog.jaoo.dk/2008/09/30/railing-sketches/comment-page-1/#comment-1433</link>
		<dc:creator>jgwong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 04:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jaoo.dk/?p=142#comment-1433</guid>
		<description>Give Lisp a look. By your definition, it is the most powerful language. To Lisp there is no difference between code and data, they are both the same . Evidence of this is it&#039;s &quot;weird&quot; syntax. While Ruby is very dynamic it will never match, due to its nature, the power of Lisp.
PS: I am a Ruby fan and earn my bread with it. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give Lisp a look. By your definition, it is the most powerful language. To Lisp there is no difference between code and data, they are both the same . Evidence of this is it&#8217;s &#8220;weird&#8221; syntax. While Ruby is very dynamic it will never match, due to its nature, the power of Lisp.<br />
PS: I am a Ruby fan and earn my bread with it. <img src='http://blog.jaoo.dk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
